Home > References

References


Klaus M. Frei 

1  

WordNet 

  • „An On-line Lexical Database�� (Miller, G. A.; Beckwith, R.; Fellbaum, Chr.; Gross, D.; Miller, K. 1993, title).
  • Based on psycho-linguistic insights (ibd.)
  • „Nouns in WordNet: A Lexical Inheritance System�� (Miller, G. A. 1993, title).
  • „lexical resource�� (Guarino 1998, p. 12)
  • WordNet synsets are „[...]  more like a thesaurus�� (Buitelaar 1998, p. 223)

          „Synset: A synonym set; a set of words that are interchangeable in                  some context.��

          (WordNet Glossary of Terms. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn/gloss)  
 

                             Is WordNet an ontology? 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

2  

WordNet 

  • „To be used as an ontology, however, some of WordNet��s lexical links need to be interpreted according to some formal semantics , (sic!) which tells us something about „the world�� and not (just) about the language. One of such links is the hyponym/hypernym relation, which corresponds in many cases to the usual subsumption (or IS-A) relation between concepts�� (Oltramari et al. 2002, p. 1 – own counting).
 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

3  

OntoClean 

  • „First of all, we do not intend this [i.e. OntoClean – KMF] as a can-didate for a ��universal�� standard ontology. Rather, we support the vision of a library of foundational ontologies, reflecting diffe-rent commitments and purposes�� (Oltramari et al. 2002, p. 3 – ita-lics orig, own counting).
 
 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

4  

OntoClean 

  • Ass.: „[...] [S]ubsumption [...] that is the basis of taxonomy is an extremely useful tool for imparting structure on an ontology. It is by far the most commonly used structuring primitive [...]�� (Guarino & Welty 2002, p. 63).
  • Impl.: „[...] these metaproperties impose constraints on the sub-sumption relation, which can be used to check the ontological consistency of taxonomic links�� (ibd., p. 62 – emph KMF).
  • „One of these constraints is that anti-rigid properties cannot subsume rigid properties�� (ibd.).
 
 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

5  

WordNet by OntoClean 
 

  • Confusion between concepts and individuals

    i.e. sortals vs. instances or IS-A vs. INSTANCE-OF

  • E.g.: Territorial Dominion • The look of WordNet 1.6 original
 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

6  

WordNet 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

7  

OntoClean 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

8  

WordNet original • WordNet OntoClean 

WordNet original 

WordNet OntoClean 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

9  

Apple in WordNet 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

10  

WordNet 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

11  

OntoClean 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

12  

OntoClean 

  • Ass.: „[...] [S]ubsumption [...] that is the basis of taxonomy is an extremely useful tool for imparting structure on an ontology. It is by far the most commonly used structuring primitive [...]�� (Guarino & Welty 2002, p. 63).
  • Impl.: „[...] these metaproperties impose constraints on the sub-sumption relation, which can be used to check the ontological consistency of taxonomic links�� (ibd., p. 62 – emph KMF).
  • „One of these constraints is that anti-rigid properties cannot subsume rigid properties�� (ibd.).
 
 
 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

13  

WordNet 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002 

KMF 

!


Klaus M. Frei 

14  

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002 

Apple in WordNet 
Redundancies/Ambiguities


Klaus M. Frei 

15  

WordNet 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002 

Redundancy 

Ambiguity (resolved)


Klaus M. Frei 

16  

OntoClean 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

17  

Conclusion 

WordNet

  • Psycho-linguistically motivated, implemented thesaurus
  • May be used as an ontology
    • subsumption-based
      • Hyponyms
      • Hypernyms
    • only along with serious problems
      • highly redundant
      • huge inconsistencies
  • Because of its ample and long-term generated database it is widespread. Besides: it is free.
 

OntoClean

  • Meta-Ontology
    • Conglomerate of principles
    • Examination tool for (existing) ontologies
  • Purpose and Use
    • Get a well-formed ontology
    • Ontology and its entities/con-cepts/instances are:
      • consistent
      • coherent
      • exclusively disjoint
      • specific to a dominion exhaustive
      • non-redundant, unambiguous and free of controversy
  • Method
    • Labelling of each entity by meta-properties. This causes a well-for-med ontology by use of sub-sumption axioms.
 
 
 
 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

18  

References 

  • Buitelaar, P.: CoreLex: An Ontology of Systematic Polysemous Classes. In: Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology in information systems. Proceedings of the First International Conference (FOIS '98), June 6-8, Trento, Italy. Amsterdam 1998: IOS. S. 221-235.
  • Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems. In: Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology in information systems. Proceedings of the First International Conference (FOIS '98), June 6-8, Trento, Italy. Amsterdam 1998: IOS. S. 3-15.
  • Guarino, N.; Welty, Chr.: Evaluating Ontological Decisions with OntoClean. In: Communications of the ACM #2, February 2002 (Vol. 45). Available on-line: http://www. ladseb.pd.cnr.it/infor/Ontology/Papers/OntologyPapers.html
  • Miller, G. A.: Nouns in WordNet: A Lexical Inheritance System. In: 5papers.pdf. Princeton 1993. Available on-line: ftp://ftp.cogsci.princeton.edu/pub/wordnet/5papers.pdf
  • Miller, G. A.; Beckwith, R.; Fellbaum, Chr.; Gross, D.; Miller, K. In: 5papers.pdf. Princeton 1993. Available on-line: ftp://ftp.cogsci.princeton.edu/pub/wordnet/5papers.pdf
  • Oltramari, A.; Gangemi, A.; Guarino, N.; Masolo; C.: Restructuring WordNet��s Top-Level: The OntoClean approach. Padova 2002. Available on-line: http://www.ladseb.pd.cnr.it/infor/Ontology/Papers/OntologyPapers.html
  • WordNet Browser used: 1.6. Latest version is 1.7.1, available on-line for UNIX and Windows systems. Mac and DOS versions are not supported anymore. Free download of data set (also PROLOG version!), browser, documentation. http://www.cogsci.princeton.edu/~wn 
 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002


Klaus M. Frei 

19  

  • „First of all, we do not intend this [i.e. OntoClean – KMF] as a can-didate for a ��universal�� standard ontology. Rather, we support the vision of a library of foundational ontologies, reflecting diffe-rent commitments and purposes�� (Oltramari et al. 2002, p. 3 – ita-lics orig).
  • „Finally, we have to point out that the ontology presented here is an ontology of particulars. Properties and relations are therefore not part of its domain�� (ibd. – italics orig).
 
 

University of Zurich • Computational Linguistics • Seminar „Wissensrepräsentation in der CL�� • Dr. Kai-Uwe Carstensen • SS 2002 

OntoClean 
Appendix


Search more related documents:References
Download Document:References

Set Home | Add to Favorites

All Rights Reserved Powered by Free Document Search and Download

Copyright © 2011
This site does not host pdf,doc,ppt,xls,rtf,txt files all document are the property of their respective owners. complaint#nuokui.com
TOP