Discipline Referrals in Urban Elementary Schools
Courtney
Russell
EDIT
6900
Spring
2011
- Introduction
- Background
for the Study
- Purpose
of the Study
- Research
Questions
- Significance
of the Study
- African
American students are disciplined at rates that are disproportionately
higher than Black students�� statistical representation
in public schools. Coined as the discipline gap, racial and ethnic
disparities are present in virtually every major school system across
the United States (Monroe, 2005).
- General
Background for the Study:
- At one
urban elementary school, African-American males are being referred to
the Main Office for discipline concerns at a highly disproportionate
rate to Latino males, as well as to African American and Latina females.
Why? What can be done about this?
- The purpose
of the study is to ��dig deeper�� into this problem and ultimately
utilize the data to (a) engage in meaningful dialogue with educators
and (b) strategize for proactive ways to reduce the discipline gap.
- What percentage
of African-American males are being referred to the Main Office as opposed
to Latino males? To African-American females? To Latina
females?
- What is
the referral percentage for each staff member and what connections can
be made from this data?
- What patterns
can be drawn from the discipline referral data (i.e. time of day, location,
interventions attempted prior to Main Office referral, etc.).
- Significance
of the Study
- By utilizing
data to engage in meaningful dialogue and, in turn, concrete action
steps, the staff members involved have the ability to positively impact
student behavior and ensure 100% of students are being provided with
an excellent education which will lead to a meaningful future.
- What
Does the Research Tell Us?
- ��Rather, there appeared to
be a differential pattern of treatment, originating at the classroom
level, wherein African-American students are referred to the office
for infractions that are more subjective in interpretation. (Michael
et al. 2002).
- A number
of possible hypotheses have been proposed as mechanisms to account for
rates of disciplinary disparity by race/ethnicity, including poverty,
differential rates of inappropriate or disruptive behavior in school
settings, and cultural mismatch or racial stereotyping (Chung et al.,
2011).
- The discipline
gap is a reverse image of the achievement gap for African American,
white, and Asian students. Data aggregated at the district level and
at the middle and high school level show that African American students,
particularly black males, are overrepresented in the ranks of disciplined
students across the nation, while white and Asian students are underrepresented
compared to their enrollment (Children��s Defense Fund,1975;Gordon
et al., 2000; Gregory, 1997; Skiba et al., 2002).
- More specifically,
African Americans are overrepresented in suspension and expulsion (Gordon
et al., 2000), and are perceived by teachers as more defiant, rule breaking,
or disruptive than other racial and ethnic groups (Newcomb et al., 2002;
Wentzel, 2002). (Gregory and Mosely, 2004).
- This study
demonstrates that even after controlling for poverty, African American
students are disproportionally represented as recipients of exclusionary
discipline and that this occurs most frequently in major-urban, very
high-poverty schools. These data provide powerful evidence that the
spirit of equal access to education is absent in a large sample of schools
from a bellwether state. When children are removed from the educational
setting, even for their seriously disruptive behavior, then they are
unable to access the very forces that might prepare them to be more
productive citizens (Mcloughlin and Noltemeyer 2010).
- Data will
be collected on a daily basis and analyzed on a bi-weekly basis according
the flow-chart on the following slide. Administrators and teachers
will collaboratively engage in this process including dialogue and utilizing
data to drive next steps. Quantitative data will be the
focus of this study.
- Sample
Size – 20+ staff members, 138 students
- K –
2 elementary school
- Year-long
study with regular review of the data
- Aber, M.
& Mattison, E. (2007). Closing the Achievement Gap:
The association of racial climate with achievement and behavioral outcomes.
American Journal of Community Psychology, 40 (1-12), 1 –
12.
- Bentley,
K., Coard, S., Stevenson, H., Thomas, D., Zamel, P. Racial and
emotional factors predicting teachers�� perceptions of classroom
behavior maladjustment for urban African American male youth.
Psychology in the Schools, 46 (2), 184 – 196.
- Birchmeier,
Z., Nicholson-Crotty, Z. & Valentine, D. (2009). Exploring
the impact of school discipline on racial disproportion in the juvenile
justice system. Social Science Quarterly.
90 (4), 1003 – 1018.
- Carroll
Nardo, A., Michael, R., Peterson, R., & Skiba, R. (2002).
The color of discipline: Sources of racial and gender disproportionality
in school punishment. The Urban Review, 34 (4), 317 –
342.
- Chung,
C., Horner, R., May, S., Rausch, M., Skiba, R., & Tobin, T.
(2011). Race is not neutral. A national investigation
of African American and Latino disproportionality in school discipline.
School Psychology Review, 40 (1), 85 – 107.
- Downey,
D. & Pribesh, S. (2004). When race matters: Teachers��
evaluation of students�� classroom behavior.
Sociology of Education, 77 (October), 267 – 282.
- Flannery,
B., Lewis-Palmer, T., & Tidwell, Amy. (2003). A description
of elementary classroom discipline referral patterns. Preventing
School Failure, 48 (1), 18 – 26.
- Gregory,
A. Mosely P. (2004). The discipline gap: Teachers��
views on the overrepresentation of African American students in the
discipline system. Equity & Excellence in Education,
37, 18 - 30
- Mcloughlin,
C. & Noltemeyer, A. (2010). Patterns of exclusionary
discipline by school typology, ethnicity, and their interaction.
Perspectives on Urban Education, Summer, 28 – 40.
- Monroe,
C. (2004). Understanding the discipline gap through a cultural
lens: implications for the education of African American students.
Intercultural Education, 16 (4), 317 – 330.