Ninth Synthesis
Imaging Summer School
Socorro, June 15-22,
2004
Polarization in Interferometry
Steven T. Myers (NRAO-Socorro)
Polarization
in interferometry
- Physics of
Polarization
- Interferometer
Response to Polarization
- Polarization
Calibration & Observational Strategies
- Polarization
Data & Image Analysis
- Astrophysics
of Polarization
- Examples
- References:
- Synth Im.
II lecture 6, also parts of 1, 3, 5, 32
- ��Tools of
Radio Astronomy�� Rohlfs & Wilson
WARNING!
- Polarimetry
is an exercise in bookkeeping!
- many places
to make sign errors!
- many places
with complex conjugation (or not)
- possible different
conventions (e.g. signs)
- different
conventions for notation!
- lots of matrix
multiplications
- And be assured��
- I��ve mixed
notations (by stealing slides )
- I��ve made
sign errors (I call it ��choice of convention�� )
- I��ve probably
made math errors
- I��ve probably
made it too confusing by going into detail
- But �� persevere
(and read up on it later)
DON��T
PANIC !
Polarization
Fundamentals
Physics
of polarization
- Maxwell��s
Equations + Wave Equation
- E•B=0
(perpendicular) ; Ez = Bz = 0 (transverse)
- Electric Vector
– 2 orthogonal independent waves:
- Ex
= E1 cos( k z – w t + d1 )
k = 2p / l
- Ey
= E2 cos( k z – w t + d2 ) w
= 2p n
- describes
helical path on surface of a cylinder��
- parameters
E1, E2, d = d1 - d2
define ellipse
The
Polarization Ellipse
- Axes of ellipse
Ea, Eb
- S0
= E12 + E22 = Ea2
+ Eb2 Poynting
flux
- d phase difference t
= k z – w t
- Ex
= Ea cos ( t + d ) = Ex cos y
+ Ey sin y
- Eh
= Eb sin ( t + d
) = -Ex
sin y + Ey cos y
Rohlfs & Wilson
The
polarization ellipse continued��
- Ellipticity
and Orientation
- E1
/ E2 = tan a
tan 2y = - tan 2a cos d
- Ea
/ Eb = tan c
sin 2c = sin 2a sin d
- handedness ( sin d > 0 or tan c > 0 right-handed)
Rohlfs & Wilson
Polarization
ellipse – special cases
- Linear polarization
- d
= d1 - d2
= m p m
= 0, ��1, ��2, ��
- ellipse becomes
straight line
- electric
vector position angle y = a
- Circular polarization
- d
= ½ ( 1 + m ) p m
= 0, 1, ��2, ��
- equation
of circle Ex2 + Ey2
= E2
- orthogonal
linear components:
- Ex
= E cos t
- Ey
= ��E cos ( t - p/2 )
- note quarter-wave
delay between Ex and Ey !
Orthogonal
representation
- A monochromatic
wave can be expressed as the superposition of two orthogonal linearly
polarized waves
- A arbitrary
elliptically polarizated wave can also equally well be described as
the superposition of two orthogonal circularly polarized waves!
- We are free
to choose the orthogonal basis for the representation of the polarization
- NOTE: Monochromatic
waves MUST be (fully) polarized – IT��S THE LAW!
Linear
and Circular representations
- Orthogonal
Linear representation:
- Ex
= Ea cos ( t + d ) = Ex cos y
+ Ey sin y
- Eh
= Eb sin ( t + d
) = -Ex
sin y + Ey cos y
- Orthogonal
Circular representation:
- Ex
= Ea cos ( t + d ) = ( Er +
El ) cos ( t + d )
- Eh
= Eb sin ( t + d
) = ( Er
- El ) cos ( t + d – p/2 )
- Er
= ½ ( Ea + Eb )
- El
= ½ ( Ea – Eb )
The
Poincare Sphere
- Treat 2y
and 2c as longitude and latitude on
sphere of radius S0
Rohlfs & Wilson
Stokes
parameters
- Spherical
coordinates: radius I, axes Q, U, V
- S0
= I = Ea2 + Eb2
- S1
= Q = S0 cos 2c cos 2y
- S2
= U = S0 cos 2c sin 2y
- S3
= V = S0 sin 2c
- Only 3 independent
parameters:
- S02
= S12 + S22 + S32
- I2
= Q2 + U2 + V2
- Stokes parameters
I,Q,U,V
- form complete
description of wave polarization
- NOTE: above
true for monochromatic wave!
Stokes
parameters and polarization ellipse
- Spherical
coordinates: radius I, axes Q, U, V
- S0
= I = Ea2 + Eb2
- S1
= Q = S0 cos 2c cos 2y
- S2
= U = S0 cos 2c sin 2y
- S3
= V = S0 sin 2c
- In terms of
the polarization ellipse:
- S0
= I = E12 + E22
- S1
= Q = E12 - E22
- S2
= U = 2 E1 E2
cos d
- S3
= V = 2 E1 E2
sin d
Stokes
parameters special cases
- Linear Polarization
- S0
= I = E2 = S
- S1
= Q = I cos 2y
- S2
= U = I sin 2y
- S3
= V = 0
- Circular Polarization
- S0
= I = S
- S1
= Q = 0
- S2
= U = 0
- S3
= V = S (RCP) or –S (LCP)
Note: cycle in 180��
Quasi-monochromatic
waves
- Monochromatic
waves are fully polarized
- Observable
waves (averaged over Dn/n << 1)
- Analytic
signals for x and y components:
- Ex(t)
= a1(t) e i(f1(t)
– 2pnt)
- Ey(t)
= a2(t) e i(f2(t)
– 2pnt)
- actual components
are the real parts Re Ex(t), Re Ey(t)
- Stokes parameters
- S0
= I = <a12> + <a22>
- S1
= Q = <a12> – <a22>
- S2
= U = 2 < a1 a2
cos d >
- S3
= V = 2 < a1 a2
sin d >
Stokes
parameters and intensity measurements
- If phase
of Ey is retarded by e relative to Ex
, the electric vector in the orientation q is:
- E(t; q, e)
= Ex cos q + Ey eie
sin q
- Intensity
measured for angle q:
- I(q, e)
= < E(t; q, e) E*(t; q, e) >
- Can calculate
Stokes parameters from 6 intensities:
- S0
= I = I(0��,0) + I(90��,0)
- S1
= Q = I(0��,0) + I(90��,0)
- S2
= U = I(45��,0) – I(135��,0)
- S3
= V = I(45��,p/2) – I(135��,p/2)
- this can
be done for single-dish (intensity) polarimetry!
Partial
polarization
- The observable
electric field need not be fully polarized as it is the superposition
of monochromatic waves
- On the Poincare
sphere:
- S02
�� S12 + S22 + S32
- I2
�� Q2 + U2 + V2
- Degree of
polarization p :
- p2
S02 = S12 + S22
+ S32
- p2
I2 = Q2 + U2 + V2
Summary
– Fundamentals
- Monochromatic
waves are polarized
- Expressible
as 2 orthogonal independent transverse waves
- elliptical
cross-section polarization ellipse
- 3 independent
parameters
- choice of
basis, e.g. linear or circular
- Poincare
sphere convenient representation
- Stokes parameters
I, Q, U, V
- I intensity;
Q,U linear polarization, V circular polarization
- Quasi-monochromatic
��waves�� in reality
- can be partially
polarized
- still represented
by Stokes parameters
Antenna
& Interferometer Polarization
Interferometer
response to polarization
- Stokes parameter
recap:
- intensity
I
- fractional
polarization (p I)2
= Q2 + U2 + V2
- linear polarization
Q,U (m I)2 = Q2
+ U2
- circular polarization
V (v I)2 = V2
- Coordinate
system dependence:
- I independent
- V depends
on choice of ��handedness��
- Q,U depend
on choice of ��North�� (plus handedness)
- Q ��points��
North, U 45 toward East
- EVPA F
= ½ tan-1 (U/Q) (North
through East)
Reflector
antenna systems
- Reflections
- turn RCP
LCP
- E-field allowed
only in plane of surface
- Curvature
of surfaces
- introduce
cross-polarization
- effect increases
with curvature (as f/D decreases)
- Symmetry
- on-axis systems
see linear cross-polarization
- off-axis
feeds introduce asymmetries & R/L squint
- Feedhorn
& Polarizers
- introduce
further effects (e.g. ��leakage��)
Optics
– Cassegrain radio telescope
- Paraboloid
illuminated by feedhorn:
Optics
– telescope response
- Reflections
- turn RCP
LCP
- E-field (currents)
allowed only in plane of surface
- ��Field
distribution�� on aperture for E and B planes:
Cross-polarization
at 45��
No cross-polarization
on axes
Polarization
field pattern
- Cross-polarization
- Off-axis
feed system
- perpendicular
elliptical linear pol. beams
- R and L beams
diverge (beam squint)
- See also:
- ��Antennas��
lecture by P. Napier
Feeds
– Linear or Circular?
- The VLA uses
a circular feedhorn design
- plus (quarter-wave)
polarizer to convert circular polarization from feed into linear polarization
in rectangular waveguide
- correlations
will be between R and L from each antenna
- RR RL LR RL
form complete set of correlations
- Linear feeds
are also used
- e.g. ATCA,
ALMA (and possibly EVLA at 1.4 GHz)
- no need for
(lossy) polarizer!
- correlations
will be between X and Y from each antenna
- XX XY YX YY
form complete set of correlations
- Optical aberrations
are the same in these two cases
- but different
response to electronic (e.g. gain) effects
Example
– simulated VLA patterns
- EVLA Memo
58 ��Using Grasp8 to Study the VLA Beam�� W. Brisken
Example
– simulated VLA patterns
- EVLA Memo
58 ��Using Grasp8 to Study the VLA Beam�� W. Brisken
Linear Polarization
Circular Polarization
cuts in R & L
Example
– measured VLA patterns
- AIPS Memo
86 ��Widefield Polarization Correction of VLA Snapshot Images at 1.4
GHz�� W. Cotton (1994)
Circular Polarization
Linear Polarization
Example
– measured VLA patterns
- frequency
dependence of polarization beam :
Beyond
optics – waveguides & receivers
- Response
of polarizers
- convert R
& L to X & Y in waveguide
- purity and
orthogonality errors
- Other elements
in signal path:
- Sub-reflector
& Feedhorn
- Ortho-mode
transducers (OMT)
- split orthogonal
modes into waveguide
- Polarizers
- retard one
mode by quarter-wave to convert LP CP
- frequency
dependent!
- Amplifiers
- separate chains
for R and L signals
Back
to the Measurement Equation
- Polarization
effects in the signal chain appear as error terms in the Measurement
Equation
- e.g.
��Calibration�� lecture, G. Moellenbrock:
- F
= ionospheric Faraday rotation
- T =
tropospheric effects
- P =
parallactic angle
- E =
antenna voltage pattern
- D =
polarization leakage
- G =
electronic gain
- B =
bandpass response
Antenna i
Baseline ij (outer
product)
Ionospheric
Faraday Rotation, F
- Birefringency
due to magnetic field in ionospheric plasma
- also present
in radio sources!
Ionospheric
Faraday Rotation, F
- The ionosphere
is birefringent; one hand of circular polarization is delayed
w.r.t. the other, introducing a phase shift:
- Rotates the
linear polarization position angle
- More important
at longer wavelengths:
- More important
at solar maximum and at sunrise/sunset, when ionosphere is most active
- Watch for
direction dependence (in-beam)
- See ��Low
Frequency Interferometry�� (C. Brogan)
Parallactic
Angle, P
- Orientation
of sky in telescope��s field of view
- Constant
for equatorial telescopes
- Varies for
alt-az-mounted telescopes:
- Rotates the
position angle of linearly polarized radiation (c.f. F)
- defined per
antenna (often same over array)
- P modulation
can be used to aid in calibration
Parallactic
Angle, P
- Parallactic
angle versus hour angle at VLA :
- fastest swing
for source passing through zenith
Polarization
Leakage, D
- Polarizer
is not ideal, so orthogonal polarizations not perfectly isolated
- Well-designed
systems have d < 1-5%
- A geometric
property of the antenna, feed & polarizer design
- frequency
dependent (e.g. quarter-wave at center n)
- direction
dependent (in beam) due to antenna
- For R,L
systems
- parallel hands
affected as d•Q + d•U ,
so only important at high dynamic range (because Q,U~d, typically)
- cross-hands
affected as d•I so almost always important
Leakage of q into p
(e.g. L into R)
Coherency
vector and correlations
- e.g. for
circularly polarized feeds:
Coherency
vector and Stokes vector
- Example:
circular polarization (e.g. VLA)
- Example:
linear polarization (e.g. ATCA)
Visibilities
and Stokes parameters
- Convolution
of sky with measurement effects:
- e.g. with
(polarized) beam E :
- imaging involves
inverse transforming these
Instrumental
effects, including
��beam�� E(l,m)
coordinate
transformation
to Stokes
parameters
(I, Q,
U, V)
Example:
RL basis
- Combining
E, etc. (no D), expanding P,S:
2c
for co-located
array
0 for
co-located
array
Example:
RL basis imaging
- Parenthetical
Note:
- can make
a pseudo-I image by gridding RR+LL on the Fourier half-plane and inverting
to a real image
- can make
a pseudo-V image by gridding RR-LL on the Fourier half-plane and inverting
to real image
- can make
a pseudo-(Q+iU) image by gridding RL to the full Fourier plane (with
LR as the conjugate) and inverting to a complex image
- does not
require having full polarization RR,RL,LR,LL for every visibility
- More on imaging
( & deconvolution ) tomorrow!
Leakage
revisited��
- Primary on-axis
effect is ��leakage�� of one polarization into the measurement of
the other (e.g. R L)
- but, direction
dependence due to polarization beam!
- Customary
to factor out on-axis leakage into D and put direction dependence in
��beam��
- example:
expand RL basis with on-axis leakage
Example:
RL basis leakage
��true��
signal
1st
order:
D•I
into P
2nd
order:
D•P
into I
2nd
order:
D2•I
into I
3rd
order:
D2•P*
into P
Example:
Linearized response
- Dropping
terms in d2, dQ, dU, dV (and
expanding G)
- warning:
using linear order can limit dynamic range!
Summary
– polarization interferometry
- Choice of
basis: CP or LP feeds
- Follow the
Measurement Equation
- ionospheric
Faraday rotation F at low frequency
- parallactic
angle P for coordinate transformation to Stokes
- ��leakage��
D varies with n and over beam (mix with E)
- Leakage
- use full (all
orders) D solver when possible
- linear approximation
OK for low dynamic range
Polarization
Calibration
&
Observation
So
you want to make a polarization map��
Strategies
for polarization observations
- Follow general
calibration procedure (last lecture)
- will need
to determine leakage D (if not known)
- often will
determine G and D together (iteratively)
- procedure
depends on basis and available calibrators
- Observations
of polarized sources
- follow usual
rules for sensitivity, uv coverage, etc.
- remember polarization
fraction is usually low! (few %)
- if goal is
to map E-vectors, remember to calculate noise in F= ½ tan-1 U/Q
- watch for
gain errors in V (for CP) or Q,U (for LP)
- for wide-field
high-dynamic range observations, will need to correct for polarized
primary beam (during imaging)
Strategies
for leakage calibration
- Need a bright
calibrator! Effects are low level��
- determine
gains G ( mostly from parallel hands)
- use cross-hands
(mostly) to determine leakage
- general ME
D solver (e.g. aips++) uses all info
- Calibrator
is unpolarized
- leakage directly
determined (ratio to I model), but only to an overall constant
- need way
to fix phase p-q (ie.
R-L phase difference), e.g. using another calibrator with known EVPA
- Calibrator
of known polarization
- leakage can
be directly determined (for I,Q,U,V model)
- unknown
p-q phase can be determined (from U/Q etc.)
Other
strategies
- Calibrator
of unknown polarization
- solve for
model IQUV and D simultaneously or iteratively
- need good
parallactic angle coverage to modulate sky and instrumental signals
- in instrument
basis, sky signal modulated by ei2c
- With a very
bright strongly polarized calibrator
- can solve
for leakages and polarization per baseline
- can solve
for leakages using parallel hands!
- With no calibrator
- hope it averages
down over parallactic angle
- transfer
D from a similar observation
- usually possible
for several days, better than nothing!
- need observations
at same frequency
Finding
polarization calibrators
- Standard
sources
- planets (unpolarized
if unresolved)
- 3C286, 3C48,
3C147 (known IQU, stable)
- sources monitored
(e.g. by VLA)
- other bright
sources (bootstrap)
http://www.vla.nrao.edu/astro/calib/polar/
Example:
D-term calibration
- D-term calibration
effect on RL visibilities :
Example:
D-term calibration
- D-term calibration
effect in image plane :
Bad D-term solution
Good D-term solution
Example:
��standard�� procedure for CP feeds
Example:
��standard�� procedure for LP feeds
Special
Issues
- Low frequency
– ionospheric Faraday rotation
- important
for 2 GHz and below (sometimes higher too)
- l2
dependence (separate out using multi-frequency obs.)
- depends on
time of day and solar activity (& observatory location)
- external
calibration using zenith TEC (plus gradient?)
- self-calibration
possible (e.g. with snapshots)
Special
issues – continued��
- VLBI polarimetry
- follows same
principles
- will have
different parallactic angle at each station!
- can have
heterogeneous feed geometry (e.g. CP & LP)
- harder to
find sources with known polarization
- calibrators
resolved!
- transfer EVPA
from monitoring program
2200+420
Subtleties
��
- Antenna-based
D solutions
- closure quantities
undetermined parameters
- different
for parallel and cross-hands
- e.g. can
add d to R and d* to L
- need for
reference antenna to align and transfer D solutions
- Parallel
hands
- are D solutions
from cross-hands appropriate here?
- what happens
in full D solution (weighting issues?)
Special
Issues – observing circular polarization
- Observing
circular polarization V is straightforward with LP feeds (from Re and
Im of cross-hands)
- With CP feeds:
- gain variations
can masquerade as (time-variable) V signal
- helps to switch
signal paths through back-end electronics
- R vs. L beam
squint introduces spurious V signal
- limited by
pointing accuracy
- requires careful
calibration
- relative R
and L gains critical
- average over
calibrators (be careful of intrinsic V)
- VLBI somewhat
easier
- different
systematics at stations help to average out
Special
Issues – wide field polarimetry
- Actually
an imaging & deconvolution issue
- assume polarized
beam D��•E is known
- see EVLA Memo
62 ��Full Primary Beam Stokes IQUV Imaging�� T. Cornwell (2003)
- Deal with
direction-dependent effects
- beam squint
(R,L) or beam ellipticity (X,Y)
- primary beam
- Iterative
scheme (e.g. CLEAN)
- implemented
in aips++
- see lectures
by Bhatnagar & Cornwell
Example:
wide field polarimetry
- Simulated
array of point sources
No beam correction
1D beam + squint
Full 2D beam
Example:
wide field polarimetry continued��
Model
Errors 1D sym.beam
Errors full beam
Panels:
I Q
U V
Summary
– Observing & Calibration
- Follow normal
calibration procedure (previous lecture)
- Need bright
calibrator for leakage D calibration
- best calibrator
has strong known polarization
- unpolarized
sources also useful
- Parallactic
angle coverage useful
- necessary
for unknown calibrator polarization
- Need to determine
unknown p-q phase
- CP feeds need
EVPA calibrator for R-L phase
- if system
stable, can transfer from other observations
- Special Issues
- observing
CP difficult with CP feeds
- wide-field
polarization imaging (needed for EVLA & ALMA)
Polarization
data analysis
- Making polarization
images
- follow general
rules for imaging & deconvolution
- image &
deconvolve in I, Q, U, V (e.g. CLEAN, MEM)
- note: Q, U,
V will be positive and negative
- in absence
of CP, V image can be used as check
- joint deconvolution
(e.g. aips++, wide-field)
- Polarization
vector plots
- use ��electric
vector position angle�� (EVPA) calibrator to set angle (e.g. R-L phase
difference)
- F
= ½ tan-1 U/Q for E vectors ( B vectors �� E )
- plot E vectors
with length given by p
- Faraday rotation:
determine DF vs. l2
Polarization
Astrophysics
Astrophysical
mechanisms for polarization
- Magnetic
fields
- synchrotron
radiation LP (small amount of CP)
- Zeeman effect
CP
- Faraday rotation
(of background polarization)
- dust grains
in magnetic field
- maser emission
- Electron
scattering
- incident
radiation with quadrupole
- e.g. Cosmic
Microwave Background
- and more��
Astrophysical
sources with polarization
- Magnetic
objects
- active galactic
nuclei (AGN) (accretion disks, MHD jets, lobes)
- protostars
(disks, jets, masers)
- clusters
of galaxies IGM
- galaxy ISM
- compact objects
(pulsars, magnetars)
- planetary
magnetospheres
- the Sun and
other (active) stars
- the early
Universe (primordial magnetic fields???)
- Other objects
- Cosmic Microwave
Background (thermal)
- Polarization
levels
- usually low
(<1% to 5-10% typically)
Example:
3C31
- VLA @ 8.4
GHz
- E-vectors
- Laing (1996)
3 kpc
Example:
Cygnus A
- VLA @ 8.5
GHz B-vectors Perley & Carilli (1996)
10 kpc
Example:
Blazar Jets
- VLBA @ 5
GHz
Attridge et al. (1999)
1055+018
Example:
the ISM of M51
Neininger (1992)
Example:
Zeeman effect
Example:
Zeeman in M17
m
Zeeman Blos:
colors (Brogan & Troland 2001) Polarization Bperp:
lines (Dotson 1996)
Color: optical from the
Digitized Sky Survey
Thick contours: radio continuum from Brogan & Troland (2001)
Thin contours: 13CO from Wilson et al. (1999)
Example:
Faraday Rotation
- VLBA
- Taylor et
al. 1998
- intrinsic
vs. galactic
15 12
8 GHz
Example:
more Faraday rotation
- See review
of ��Cluster Magnetic Fields�� by Carilli & Taylor 2002 (ARAA)
Example:
Galactic Faraday Rotation
- Mapping galactic
magnetic fields with FR
Han, Manchester, &
Qiao (1999)
Han et al. (2002)
Filled:
positive RM Open: negative RM
Example:
Stellar SiO Masers
- R Aqr
- VLBA @ 43
GHz
- Boboltz et
al. 1998