Home > Introduction to the Capstone Project
UNIVERSITY OF BRIDGEPORT COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC
CAPSTONE
PROJECT GUIDELINES
Table of Contents
To nurture a culture of respect for the scientific method, research and evidence-based practice within the profession of chiropractic, the University Of Bridgeport College Of Chiropractic has instituted a graduation requirement of a written Capstone Project. There are two approved plans leading to completion of the Capstone requirement: A Senior Paper and a Research Thesis. A Senior Paper is the minimum research writing requirement for graduation from the University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic Doctor of Chiropractic (D.C.) program. A Research Thesis is a special type of Capstone Project and can be any type of original investigative research (e.g., survey, case-control study, cohort study, clinical trial or basic science study).
All Capstone Projects must be suitable for publication.
Suitable for publication in the context of a U.B.C.C Capstone Project means that a manuscript must be in the format and style (see Appendix A – Good Scientific Writing) that a peer-reviewed, indexed, scientific publication, for example the Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics (JMPT) would reasonably consider for publication.
In an effort to ensure that the Capstone Project prepares future doctors to become contributors to the profession’s knowledgebase, these guidelines include sections from the Instructions for Authors from JMPT. (1) This material is copyrighted and appears with permission of JMPT. Part 4 of these guidelines is edited from JMPT’s Instructions for Authors. Part 4 is applicable to all Capstone Projects.
A Senior Paper is the work of a single student and can be a literature review, case report or case series.
The literature review must be on a professionally relevant topic. This will be in the form of a critical narrative review, but a systematic review can be attempted with agreement of the student’s advisor.
Clinical case report or case series can be derived from case(s) from the U.B.C.C Health Sciences Center, affiliated doctor’s practices or affiliated institutions.
In order to qualify to start a Research Thesis a student must have, by their 4th semester, a minimum cumulative Graduate Point Average of 3.25 (or permission of the College Research/Scholarship Committee (RSC). A Research Thesis may be conducted with a research team of up to four students. Completion of a Research Thesis is the first of the requirements for a student to earn the Distinction in Research designation on their diploma.
If the topic for the Capstone Project was suggested by a faculty member, that faculty member will serve as the student’s advisor.
Projects generated by students will be assigned an advisor by the Capstone Projects Subcommittee of the Research/Scholarship Committee with first preference given to the faculty the student requests. Any faculty can be requested by students to serve as advisor.
Students submit the Capstone Advisor Assignment Form (Appendix B) which will be used by the Projects Subcommittee of the Research/Scholarship Committee to assign an advisor.
A student or team of up to four students conducting a Research Thesis will, in addition to their advisor (as discussed above) recruit at least two other faculty to join their thesis committee. Thus, a thesis committee will have three members. The Advisor shall chair the Thesis Committee.
Students are encouraged to invite the members of their thesis committee from other academic units of the University or from other educational institutions.
When a faculty member agrees to serve on the student’s thesis committee, the student should give them the Thesis Committee Invitation Acceptance Form (Appendix C) to sign. The completed form must be submitted to the Research/Scholarship Committee Chair. Students should note that faculty may elect not to accept their invitations to serve on their thesis committee.
The two additional members of the thesis committee will review and suggest changes to the thesis only after the research has been completed and the Advisor has approved the draft of the thesis.
All students and their advisors will produce a Capstone Completion Contract (for a Senior Paper – Appendix D, for a Research Thesis – Appendix E). This will detail what tasks will be accomplished at the end of each semester or summer break. For a Research Thesis the tasks will be assigned to each member of the group working on one thesis.
Successful completion of the student’s semester tasks will result in a grade of “Satisfactory” for that semester’s Capstone Project course. If the tasks are not completed, the student will receive an “Incomplete”. Incomplete work must be completed according to College of Chiropractic academic policy or a grade of F will be earned. Failing grades can prevent normal progression towards graduation.
The expected completion date for any type of Capstone Project is the 12th week of the 7th semester. Completion after the deadline may delay graduation.
Submission of the student’s Capstone Project, and acceptance of it by the student’s Advisor and the Chair or the designate of the RSC is a requirement for graduation from the University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic.
Papers should not be bound until approved by both the advisor and the Research/Scholarship Committee. All costs for binding will be borne by the student. Manuscripts will be bound using heat-sealed Velo™ binding with a clear front cover and black vinyl back cover (currently available at Kinko’s Printing).
Final submission to the Dean of the College of Chiropractic of the following:
Students completing a Research Thesis may qualify to receive their Doctor of Chiropractic degree with Distinction In Research. The minimum standards for this academic honor are:
If submission, defense and presentation of a Research Thesis is after the 12th week of the 7th semester, the student can choose to receive a Certificate of Distinction in Research instead, or bear the cost of re-issuing the diploma with this designation.
It is the author's responsibility to secure all copyright permissions and permission to state names or institutions in the acknowledgements and provide these to the U.B.C.C. Research/Scholarship Committee. Illustrations or content from other publications (print or electronic) must be submitted with written permission from the publisher (and author if required) and must be acknowledged in the manuscript. (1)
To verify that all material in a student’s manuscript complies with copyright law, all manuscripts will be submitted to turnitin.com for an analysis of the content’s originality. Students will obtain access to Turnitin from their advisor.
U.B.C.C. endorses the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) guidelines and the Declaration of Helsinki, and all related conditions regarding the experimental use of human subjects and their informed consent will apply. All Research Projects must be approved by the University of Bridgeport Instructional Review Board (IRB) and shall clearly include this statement in the Methods section. Projects that report the results of experimental investigations with human subjects must include a statement that informed consent was obtained (in writing, from the subject or legal guardian) after the procedure(s) had been fully explained. Written informed consent for publication must to be obtained from patients for case reports, case series, and retrospective designs. (1)
Research conducted at affiliated institutions must also comply with the IRB requirements of those institutions.
It is the authors' responsibility to maintain appropriate records as well as protect patients' identity. Ethical and legal considerations require careful attention to the protection of the patient's anonymity in case reports and other publications. Identifying information such as names, initials, actual case numbers, and specific dates must be avoided; identifying information about a patient's personal history and characteristics should be disguised. Photographs or artistic likenesses of subjects are publishable only with their written consent or the consent of legal guardian; the signed consent form, giving any special conditions (i.e., eyes blocked off), must accompany manuscript. (1)
Case reports reflect accounts of the diagnosis and treatment of unusual, difficult, or otherwise interesting cases that may have independent educational value or may contribute to better standardization of care for a particular health problem when correlated with similar reports of others. Case series are retrospective comparative assessments of the diagnosis and treatment of several cases of a similar condition, i.e., the comparative evaluation of two or more (perhaps hundreds) of case reports. Consent for publication in print and electronic format must be obtained from patients and be made available to the editor upon request. Authors should include a statement in the text that the patient(s) gave consent to have personal health information published without divulging personal identifiers. For more information about HIPAA as it relates to obtaining patient consent for publication, please refer to http://privacyruleandresearch.nih.gov/faq.asp (1)
Assessments of current knowledge of a particular subject of interest that synthesize evidence relevant to well-defined questions about diagnosis, prognosis, or therapy with emphasis on better correlation, the demonstration of ambiguities, and the delineation of areas that may constitute hypotheses for further study. (1)
A Senior Paper should generally contain:
Note: The final judge of what is the appropriate breadth and depth of a Senior Paper is the faculty advisor.
A complete thesis proposal must be submitted and approved by the Advisor prior to presentation to the University of Bridgeport IRB. A proposal shall include the following sections of the manuscript: Introduction, review of the literature and methods
Tentative Budget is to be submitted with initial thesis proposal. Clearly indicate how much funding one is requesting to execute the study (budget usually cannot exceed $800 per project and is dependent on RSC approval). The budget should include a description of each expense, and dollar amount of each
The Request for Reimbursement is to be submitted after acceptance of the thesis (unless an earlier payment plan is approved by the Research/Scholarship Committee. The Request must include a summary of all pre-approved budget expenses. All of the original receipts must be submitted for reimbursement to occur. Indication in writing the one group member to whom the reimbursement check should be made out, and this individual will be responsible for dividing the money among the other group members
The Research/Scholarship Committee may grant up to three monetary awards to three students’ theses at graduation.
Any Research Thesis which has been approved by the student’s Thesis Committee and the RSC and submitted to the RSC before the deadline of the 12th week of the 7th semester is eligible for the University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic Student Research Awards.
All manuscripts will be submitted on standard 8½ in. x 11 in. white standard photocopy/laser printer paper. Printing will be in black ink with 12 point Times Roman or equivalent typeface. Margins will be 1in. on all sides.
Manuscripts must be prepared in accordance with the Declaration of Vancouver "Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals" (available from www.icmje.org). The manuscript should be in double-spaced format. Do not break any words (hyphenate) at the end of any line and do not insert hard page breaks. (1)
Except for the title page, all pages in a Capstone Project will be numbered on the bottom center of each page. The front matter (see below) will be numbered using lower case Roman numerals (e.g. i, ii, iii, iv, etc.). Although it will not be seen the title page is page i. The manuscript body will be numbered using Arabic numerals (e.g., 1, 2, 3,etc.). The initial page will be number one.
Standard spelling and terminology should be used whenever possible. Avoid creating new terms or acronyms for entities that already exist. Technical terms that are used in statistics should not be used as non-technical terms, such as "random" (which implies a randomizing device), "normal," "significant" (which implies statistical significance), and "sample." (1)
The International System of Units (SI) is the standard.
Use only standard abbreviations for units of measurement, statistical terms, biological references, journal names, etc. Avoid abbreviations in titles and abstracts. The full term should precede its abbreviation for the first use in the manuscript, unless it is a standard unit of measurement. For standard abbreviations, consult the following:
The structured abstract should be no more than 250 words. Structured abstracts are required for all original data reports, reviews of the literature, clinical guidelines, and case reports/series. The abstract should consist of 4 paragraphs, labeled: Purpose, Methods (includes study design and statistical methods), Results, and Conclusions. (1)
Provide approximately 4-6 key indexing terms that will assist indexers in cross-indexing your article and that may be published with the abstract. These terms should come from the Index Medicus Medical Subject Headings (MeSH). (1)
Provides reader with necessary background and setting to put the problem in proper context. It allows the reader to see the basis for the literature review. An introduction should be factual – contains cited research, facts and statements, also opinions and points of view. It should provide a logical lead into a clear and concise problem within the literature. Concluding the introduction is a statement of the purpose of the review.
A critical assessment of the research that has been conducted on the topic. The review should be organized into categories (e.g. those in support of a particular hypothesis, those against, and those offering alternative hypotheses entirely). Summarize the individual papers with as much or as little detail as each deserves depending up on its relative importance in the overall literature on the topic.
The strengths or weaknesses in the methods of the studies reviewed should be highlighted. As one discusses the relevant similarities and differences between papers.
A conclusion should then state clearly the main conclusions of the review and give a clear explanation of their importance and relevance.
This section gives an introduction to the case report. The condition should be explained as one would to a health care provider who is not a specialist in the area. This must include a literature review of the condition. There should be a concluding statement about what is being reported in the paper.
This section presents all the details about the case. It should include demographic information but cannot include enough detail that might lead to the identification of the patient. The relevant medical history of the patient, signs and symptoms, all tests that were carried out, and a description of any treatment or intervention in a chronological order. This section may be broken into subsections with appropriate subheadings.
The discussion should explain what is important about the case. It should discuss how this case is similar or different than what is reported in the literature. Any recommendations as a result of the findings in this case should be made. Finally the main conclusions of the case report and give a clear explanation of their importance and relevance.
This section should provide a statement to confirm that the patient has given their consent for the case report to be published. "Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publication of this case report and any accompanying images.” If the patient has died then consent must be obtained from the executor of the estate. If the patient is a minor, or cannot give consent for other reasons, consent must be provides by the parents or legal guardians of the patient. In these cases, the statement in the 'Consent' section of the manuscript should be appropriately rewritten.
The text of observational and experimental articles are usually divided into sections with the headings: Introduction, Methods, Results, and Discussion. Longer articles may need subheadings within some sections to clarify or break up content. Other types of articles such as case reports, reviews, editorials, and commentaries may need other formats. (1)
Clearly state the purpose of the article. Summarize the rationale for the study or observation. Give only pertinent references and do not review the subject extensively; the introduction should serve only to introduce what was done and why it was done. State the specific purpose, research objective, or hypothesis tested by the study (typically found at the end of the introduction section). (1)
The selection and description of participants, technical information, and statistics used should be reported in this section. Describe the selection of the observational or experimental subjects (patients or experimental animals, including controls). Papers of a specific study design should follow current and relevant guidelines (e.g., CONSORT, MOOSE, QUOROM, STARD, TREND, etc.) and include appropriate materials in the text. Identify the methods, apparatus (manufacturer's name and address in parentheses) and procedures in sufficient detail to allow others to reproduce the work for comparison of results. Give references to established methods, provide references and brief descriptions for methods that have been published but may not be well known, describe new or substantially modified methods and give reasons for using them and evaluate their limitations. When reporting experiments with human subjects, indicate the procedures used in accordance with the ethical standards of the Committee on Human Experimentation of the institution in which the research was conducted and/or were done in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Clearly indicate the ethics review board or IRB that approved the study. When reporting experiments on animals, indicate whether the institution's or the National Research Council's guide for the care and use of laboratory animals was followed. Do not use patient names, initials, or hospital numbers or in any manner give information by which the individuals can be identified. The author may be requested to provide the editor documentation from the ethics board and methods used to review the work. (1)
Describe the statistical methods in enough detail that would allow a knowledgeable reader with access to the original data to verify the results. Findings should include appropriate indicators of measurement error or uncertainty, such as confidence intervals. (1)
Examples of statistical details that should be included in the methods section are: the eligibility of experimental subjects, details about randomization, methods for blinding, complications of treatment, numb of observations, dropouts from a clinical trial, the statistical programs used. In the results section, state the statistical methods used to analyze the results. All statistical terms, abbreviations, and symbols should be defined. (1)
Include numbers of observations and the statistical significance of the findings when appropriate. Detailed statistical analyses, mathematical derivations, and the like may sometimes be suitably presented in the form of one or more appendixes. (1)
Present your results in logical sequence within the text, tables, and figures. Do not repeat findings in multiple places (e.g., do not include the same data in both text and tables). Emphasize or summarize only important observations, do not discuss findings in this section. (1)
The discussion should emphasize the important aspects of the study and include conclusions that follow from these observations. Do not repeat data presented in the Results section and do not include information or work that is not directly relevant to the study. State new hypotheses when indicated, but clearly label them as such. Statements that are unsupported, that generalize, or that over extrapolate the findings should not be included. Limitations to the study, including bias, should be clearly stated. (1)
Conclusions that may be drawn from the study may be included in the discussion; however, they may be more appropriately presented in a separate section. The principal conclusions should be directly linked to the goals of the study. Unqualified statements and conclusions not supported by your data should not be included. Avoid claiming priority or referring to work that has not been completed or published. State new hypotheses when warranted but clearly label them as such. Recommendations (for further study, etc), when appropriate, may be included. (1)
Tables should be numbered as they appear in the text (e.g., Table 1). Identify statistical measures of variation, such as standard deviation and standard error of mean. If data are used from another source, the author should acknowledge the original source in the text and include the written permission from the copyright holder to reproduce the material with the submission. (1)
Using Arabic numerals, number each table consecutively (in the order in which they were listed in the text in parentheses) and supply a brief title to appear at the top of the table above a horizontal line; place any necessary explanatory matter in footnotes at the bottom of the table below a horizontal line and identify with footnote symbols *, , , §, , , **, , etc. (1)
Do not submit tables as photographs. Avoid as much as possible the use of too many tables in relation to length of the text, as this may produce difficulties in layout of the pages. Avoid the use of tables that do not fit in the 'portrait' layout. Table contents and number of tables may be subject to editing. (1)
Figures should be numbered as they appear in the text (eg, Fig 1). Illustrations (including lettering, numbering and/or symbols) must be of professional quality and of sufficient size so that when reduced for publication all details will be clearly discernible; rough sketches with freehand or typed lettering are not acceptable. All illustrations (including x-rays) must be sent as at least 300 dpi resolution in TIF format. Do not place titles or detailed explanations in the illustration; such information should be given in the figure legends. Original data for graphs or charts may be requested by the editor if the submitted figure is not clear or of poor quality for printing. (1)
Each figure should be saved using the figure number in its file name (eg, Fig1) and sent as separate files. Do not imbed images in the manuscript files and do not send in PowerPoint format. Typically no more than eight figures are acceptable (eg, Fig 1A and Fig 1B are considered two figures). (1)
If photographs of persons are used, the subjects must not be identifiable or their pictures must be accompanied by signed written permission to publish the photographs. (1)
If a figure has been previously published, acknowledge the original source and submit written permission from the copyright holder to reproduce the material. Permission is required, regardless of authorship or publisher, except for documents in the public domain. (1)
Type legends for tables and figures at the end of the text after the reference section. Identify each legend with Arabic numerals in the same manner and sequence as they were indicated in the text in parentheses (i.e., Figure 1). Do not type legends within or include in images. (1)
When symbols, arrows, numbers or letters are used to identify parts of the illustrations, identify and explain each one clearly in the legend. (1)
Acknowledge only those who have made substantive contributions to the study itself; this includes support personnel such as statistical or manuscript review consultants, but not subjects used in the study or clerical staff. Clearly state what each contributor has provided. Authors are responsible for obtaining the written permission (to be included with the submission) that is required from persons, institutions, or businesses being acknowledged by name because readers may infer their endorsement of the data and conclusions. (1)
Authors are responsible for accurate reference and citation information, especially accuracy of author names, journal titles, volume numbers, and page numbers. References should be numbered consecutively when they are first used in the text. Reference citation in the text should be in superscript format and after punctuation (eg, The quick fox jumped over the dog.1). References should be listed in numeric order (not alphabetically) following the text pages. The original citation number assigned to a reference should be reused each time the reference is cited in the text, regardless of its previous position in the text: do not assign it another number. References should not be included in abstracts. References that are only used in tables or figure legends should be numbered in the sequence established by the first use of the particular table or figure in the text. (1)
Only references that provide support for a particular statement in the text, tables, and/or figures should be used. Reference or referring to unpublished work should be avoided. Excessive use of references should be avoided. (1)
Authors are responsible to verify references against the original document and not from reading the abstract alone. Care should be taken to accurately represent the original work and not misconstrue the original meaning of the paper. (1)
Using only the abstract, referring to "unpublished observations" and "personal communications" should be avoided. Unpublished references (submitted but not accepted) should not be listed as references. Manuscripts that are accepted but not yet published may be included in the references with the designation "in press." The author should obtain written permission to cite these papers and may be requested by the editor to provide documentation to verify the paper was accepted for publication. For the most part, sources of information and reference support for a bioscientific paper should be limited to journals (rather than books) because that knowledge is generally considered more recent and (in the case of refereed journals) more accurate. (1)
The style should be in accordance
with that specified by the US National Library of Medicine. Specific
examples of correct reference form for journal articles and other publications
can be found at: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/bsd/uniform_requirements.html
(1)
The format for at typical journal article is as follows:
Used by permission of the authors
(2)
Good Scientific
Writing: Advice from the Editors of Chiropractic & Osteopathy
Authors: Hartman S, Cameron M, French SD, Perle SM, Walker BF
"A sentence should contain no unnecessary words,
a paragraph no unnecessary sentences,
for the same reason that a drawing should have no unnecessary lines
and a machine
no unnecessary parts." [1]
Simply phrased, the goal of
scientific writing is the succinct, effective, written communication
of facts and ideas. Although numerous characteristics of style can contribute
to good writing, we will focus on what we think of as the big three:
submitted manuscripts must be complete, clear, and concise.
Complete:
Provide all information readers
may need to comprehend, interpret, and replicate your findings. Avoid
general terminology, in favor of words carrying all useful detail. For
example, in a case report:
The
patient expressed discomfort.
would carry less meaning than:
The patient complained of
nausea and dizziness.
Clear:
Clear writing yields a manuscript
that is unambiguous. We favor any element of style that supports this
objective. For example:
1) Use correct grammar
and punctuation to enhance clarity. Such rules of style help writers
assemble and arrange parts of speech to facilitate readers' quick and
accurate interpretation.
2) Use common or simple
words wherever possible. Familiar English usually leads to quicker and
more certain interpretation of ideas, than uncommon, more complex language.
This does not mean that fancy wording or jargon cannot be useful in
scientific writing, but try to use words that will be understood by
all.
3) Sequence concepts logically,
in an active voice. Even if you have used correct words, clumsy ordering
may jeopardize clarity, conceptual flow, or even understanding. A "rule
of thumb": the fewer punctuational pauses required, the better.
Writing with fewer commas, semi-colons, and parentheses is usually more
direct and naturally flowing, helping readers interpret meaning more
quickly and reliably. For example:
She
rinsed all bottles with a bleach solution, to sanitize them.
is
more directly (and succinctly) phrased as:
She
sanitized all bottles with a bleach solution.
4) Write concisely. You
can enhance clarity by removing all words that do not help carry your
message.
Concise:
Readers of scientific writing
are often trying to maintain an up-to-date knowledge base, for their
own scholarly use, or to assist their clinical practice. When they read
your work, the more quickly they can digest your question(s), protocol(s),
results, and conclusions, the sooner they can move to their next task.
Except for words necessary to make your submission complete and clear
– the fewer, the better.
For example, please read the
following sentence for understanding:
These two protocols
produce different side effects that are important, and that need to
be taken fully into account when studies of the outcomes following these
two particular interventions are conducted.
Now, see if you agree that
rendering this sentence in 11 words (rather than 31) permitted you to
make sense of it more quickly:
When comparing efficacies
of these interventions, side effects must be considered.
Another "rule of thumb"
for good scientific writing: use as many words as you must to communicate
your idea clearly, and not one word more (or fewer). If we judge that
a word, phrase, or sentence does not help deliver your message, we may
require that you change or delete it.
* * *
Submission:
Even if your science seems
good, if we judge your submission incomplete, unclear, or wordy, we
will return it for cleansing—usually before peer review. To maximize
the likelihood that external reviewers and editors will receive your
submission with favor, we recommend the following protocol:
1) adhere strictly to our
Instructions for Authors [2];
2) as your manuscript nears
completion, scour it for grammatical and punctuational flaws;
3) remove every word that
does not help carry a message;
4) use common language,
rather than terms possibly known only to English linguists or content
specialists (if you must use special terms, define them);
5) avoid general terms,
in favor of words that carry more meaning; and
6) move or change words,
passages, and paragraphs, to maximize clarity and conceptual flow.
7) After a long enough
break to permit a fresh perspective, read your manuscript again. (Writing
can be enjoyable, if you give yourself time to do it right; repeat this
step as often as necessary.)
Once satisfied that your manuscript
is as clean as you can make it,
8) share it with one or
more colleagues likely to notice remaining ambiguities or grammatical
flaws.
Finally, if English is your
second language (or you still are not confident that your manuscript
is as clear and concise as it can be), we strongly recommend that you
9) engage a professional
copyediting service.[3]
No BioMed Central journal editors
(including those of Chiropractic & Osteopathy) provide detailed
copyediting prior to publication. This important step is left to authors.
Share with copy editors the
preceding items two through six, so they understand that you want them
to render your manuscript as clear and concise as possible. Also, request
that they make these alterations without concern for your personal writing
style or feelings.
If your work is properly reported
when submitted, the process leading to publication will be more enjoyable
for all (and months faster).
Sources:
1. Strunk W and White EB: The Elements of Style (4th Ed.). New York: Longman; 2000:23.
[We recommend this classic
because it offers a concise, user-friendly perspective on what constitutes
good writing.]
2. For concise presentation of conventions of style and formatting not specified in our
Instructions for Authors (http://www.chiroandosteo.com/info/instructions/), see: The Cochrane Collaboration: Cochrane Style Guide, 3.0; 2005
(http://www.cochrane.org/style/csg.htm).
3. For copyediting, use any service that you know to be reliable. After testing several, we were most pleased with BioScience (http://www.biosciencewriters.com) and Lindsay Schuenke (http://www.schuenkecommunications.com).
| University
of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic Capstone Advisor Assignment Form |
This form is for the preliminary approval of Capstone Project title and for the assignment of an advisor. This is to be submitted to the University Of Bridgeport College Of Chiropractic Research/Scholarship Committee (R/SC) prior to substantive work on the Capstone Project. This from must be completed electronically
| Student’s name: | |||
| Student ID#: | Date: | ||
| Check
Choice of Capstone Type |
Senior Paper | Research Thesis | |
|
Check if this Capstone was proposed by a faculty member If so submit only that faculty member’s name. Requested Faculty Advisors (3) for student generated topic |
|||
| Capstone
Project Working Title: |
|||
Research/Scholarship Committee
| Approval | Pending Committee Acceptance | |
| Signature of Research/Scholarship Committee Chair | Date | |
| Deferred
Rejected |
||
| Signature of Research/Scholarship Committee Chair | Date | |
| Reason: | ||
| Advisor: | ||
| Introduction to this proposed Capstone (cite relevant research – at least 10 references): |
| Methods and Techniques to be used: (include experimental design) population and sample, instrumentation and/or methodology, estimated cost) (Research Thesis only) |
| Data Analysis (include statistical procedures.)( Research Thesis only) |
| Preliminary Bibliography of at least Ten Sources (use Vancouver format) |
| Itemized list of projected expenses (Research Thesis only) |
| U.B.C.C
Capstone Research Project
Thesis
Committee |
__________________________ has asked
me to be a member of his/her/their thesis committee for a thesis tentatively
entitled:
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
________________________________________________________________
I hereby agree to serve
on this thesis committee.
________________________________________
Faculty
Member Printed Name
________________________________________ ________
Signature
Date
Please return this for to the chair of
the Research/Scholarship Committee in order to ensure completed proposal
acceptance.
| U.B.C.C
Capstone Project
Senior Paper Completion Contract |
|||||||||
|
Student’s Name: |
|
||||||||
| Faculty Advisor’s Name: | |||||||||
| Type
of Senior Paper:
Literature Review Case Report Other |
|||||||||
| Anticipated Date of Graduation: December 20 | May 20 | ||||||||
| Tentative Title: |
|||||||||
| COMPLETION DEADLINE | |
| (Circle Appropriate Semester or Summer) | Task |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Introduction |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Literature Review |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Methods |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Results |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Discussion and Conclusion |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Abstract |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Approval from Advisor |
| 12th
week of
the 7th semester |
Final submission |
I acknowledge that completion of each
task or tasks listed above are required to earn a satisfactory grade
for each semester’s capstone project course. I understand that
failure to complete the assigned task by the deadline agreed to above
may delay my graduation from U.B.C.C.
| Student’s Name | Signature | Date | |||
| U.B.C.C
Capstone Project
Research Project Completion Contract |
||||||||||
|
1st Student: |
3rd Student: |
|||||||||
| 2nd Student: |
4th Student: |
|||||||||
| Faculty Advisor’s Name: | ||||||||||
| Anticipated Date of Graduation: December 20 | May 20 | |||||||||
| Tentative Title: |
||||||||||
| COMPLETION DEADLINE | ||
| (Circle Appropriate Semester or Summer) | Task | Responsible Student(s) |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Introduction | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Literature review | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Methods | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | IRB submission | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Data collection | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Results | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Discussion | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Conclusion | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Abstract | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Approval from Advisor | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Approval from Committee | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Defense | |
| S1 5 S2 6 S3 7 | Presentation to College | |
| 12th week of the 7th semester | Final submission | |
I (we) acknowledge that completion of each task or tasks listed above are required to earn a satisfactory grade for each semester’s capstone project course. I (we) understand that failure to complete the assigned task by the deadline agreed to above may delay my (our) graduation from U.B.C.C.
| Student’s Name | Signature | Date | |||
| 1st | |||||
| 2nd | |||||
| 3rd | |||||
| 4th |
↓ Margin 1”
TITLE
Margin 1 ½” Margin 1”
→
←
AUTHOR’S NAME
A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty
of the University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic in
Partial Fulfillment of the
requirements for the Degree of
DOCTOR OF CHIROPRACTIC and
accepted this ________ day of ________________ , 20__.
(Remove the
Underlines and Titles and type inn the date
↑ Margin 1”
SIGNATURE SHEET
(Example Senior Paper)
Name of Author: “Author”
Place of Birth “City”
Title of Thesis
Degree Doctor of Chiropractic
Academic History
Baccalaureate Degree “Institution” Date
“Other
Degrees” “Institution” Date
COMMITTEE
“Name of “Advisor (Type in name) __________________________ __________
Advisor Signature of Advisor Date
(Type names in proper places and Add Committee Members as NEEDED)
CHAIR, RESEARCH/SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE UBCC
(Chair’s name types) ____________________________ __________
Signature Date
SIGNATURE SHEET (Example Research Thesis)
Name of Author Ted Jones Name of Author Frank Smith
Place of Birth Humorville, NY Place of Birth Pleasantville, PA
Title of Thesis The Effects of This on That
Degree Doctor of Chiropractic
Academic History: Ted Jones
Baccalaureate Degree Slippery Water University Date 1824
Master of Science Southern Big University Date 1903
Academic History: Frank Smith
Baccalaureate Degree Small University Date 1824
COMMITTEE
John Doe, D.C. __________________________ ______________
Advisor Signature of Advisor Date
Jane Goodhands, D.C. __________________________ _______________
Committee Member Signature Date
George Badhands, D.O. __________________________ _______________
Signature Date
CHAIR, RESEARCH / SCHOLARSHIP COMMITTEE UBCC
___________________________ _______________
John A. Knowledge, D. C. Signature Date
All Rights Reserved Powered by Free Document Search and Download
Copyright © 2011